Kate's Royal Jewels: What Could She Wear in Australia? We Look Back at the Queen and Diana's Sparkling Moments Down Under

02/14/2014 at 09:00 AM ET

On Tuesday, Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge looked every inch the princess as she stepped out in London for one of her favorite charities, the National Portrait Gallery (far right). But she had a (very fancy) assist from Queen Elizabeth: Kate, 32, wore the “Nizam of Hyderabad” necklace, which had been given the Queen on her wedding day. The Nizam instructed Elizabeth to choose anything she wanted from Cartier; she selected this long chain with 38 diamonds while its center, plus 13 emerald cut diamonds and a pear-shaped drop. “It was one of the most magnificent wedding presents,” says Leslie Field, author of The Queen’s Jewels.

It was the fourth time the Queen has lent jewelry to Kate (though it was the first piece originally owned by the Queen; all of the other jewels she’s worn were handed down to the Queen from the Queen Mother) and she is expected to do so again when Kate heads to New Zealand and Australia in April. Below, we look at the diamonds Kate’s already borrowed from the palace, the royal jewels worn by Princess Diana on her trips to Australia and New Zealand in the 1980s, and the probable pieces Queen Elizabeth will loan to Kate in the coming months.

Royal jewels Kate has worn so far:

Kate Middleton jewelryCamera Press/Redux; Mark Cuthbert/UK Press/Getty;

Perhaps the most famous piece of royal jewelry Kate borrowed is also her first: the delicate Cartier “Halo” tiara she wore on her wedding day in 2011 (center). It’s not believed the Queen has worn it in public; an anniversary gift from the Queen Mother’s husband King George VI, it was purchased from Cartier in 1936 and has nearly 1,000 diamonds. In 1944, the Queen Mother gave the tiara to her daughter Elizabeth as an 18th birthday gift.

Kate’s next “loan” from the queen was a diamond maple leaf brooch. The brooch was also a present from King George to the Queen Mother on the eve of their first Canadian tour in 1939. Since then it has been worn by the Queen and Camilla during Canadian visits. Most recently Kate wore it with two separate outfits on her first North American tour: on Canada Day and again when departing the country.

Kate also recently wore another crown: the Papyrus (or Lotus Flower) tiara (see it here!). It was originally a necklace gifted to the Queen Mother by her husband King George VI in 1923 as a wedding present, which she reworked into a tiara. “It’s a beautiful pearl and diamond piece,” says Field. “It is not overwhelmingly big or high which is good because Catherine is tall. It’s probably quite lightweight and comfortable to wear.”

RELATED: All things royal! Catch up on the latest with Kate, William and George right here.

Jewels worn by Diana during her visit to Australia and New Zealand:

Diana Australia jewelryAnwar Hussein/Getty; Rex USA (2)/span>

The late Diana, Princess of Wales had many occasions to wear dazzling jewels, including on her own tours of Australia and New Zealand in the 1980s. The Cambridge Lover’s Knot tiara (left) was made for Queen Mary by Garrard in 1914 and left to Queen Elizabeth in Queen Mary’s will. Elizabeth passed it on to Diana as a wedding present and she wore it on many occasions at home and abroad — including to her farewell State Banquet in Auckland in 1983, with a truly voluminous ivory dress.

The Queen also received several necklaces from Saudi Kings which she loaned to Princess Diana — one of which Diana wore to Australia in 1983. The King Faisal of Saudi Arabia fringe necklace of drop diamonds, made by Harry Winston was given to the Queen on a state visit to the UK in 1967. Nearly 20 years later, Diana teamed it with pearl drops and a ruffled pale blue dress.

Diana also refashioned some jewelry so she could wear it in a more modern way. The Queen gave Diana her famous diamond-and-emerald Delhi Durbar necklace for a wedding present. When she gave it to Diana as a wedding gift, Diana had some Velcro added to the 14-in. long necklace and it became a bejeweled headband that she wore for a charity dance with Prince Charles in Australia in 1984.

“When Diana and Charles made their first visit to Australia in 1982, it was a more formal time. There were galas, and state banquets and big dances,” Field says. “Diana took her diamond and emerald necklace that belonged to Queen Mary and wore it as a headband. Everybody raved about her originality. She may have been showing the modern way of wearing grand jewelry.”

RELATED: Remembering Diana: The photos that will stand the test of time.

What Might Kate Wear in Australia and New Zealand?

Queen Elizabeth jewelsMark Cuthbert/UK Press/Getty; Nils Jorgensen/Rex U

Field says that there are two brooches that might be taken on the plane Down Under, to wear as a mark of respect for the host country. In New Zealand, she could wear the diamond and platinum brooch in the form of a silver fern, the emblem of New Zealand (center). It was given to the Queen by the “Women of Auckland” as a Christmas present in 1953, during the new Queen’s Commonwealth tour to mark her Coronation. “It isn’t big and splashy,” says Field.

In Australia, Kate might opt for the Wattle Brooch (seen recently, at left, and in 1954 during a tour of Canberra, Australia). It was given to the Queen by the then Prime Minister at a State Banquet in Canberra in February 1954. Set with 150 diamonds with rare yellow ones forming the wattle (Australia’s emblem), a five-carat diamonds is set in the center of three tea tree flowers. “She was in Australia for quite a long time and wore a lot of jewelry,” Field says. “While she was there she was given this brooch. It is a spray of yellow and white diamonds and she often still wears it today — if she is wearing yellow.”

If Kate does decide to wear the Queen’s jewels, Field suggests, “she could wear something in a less conventional manner. There are ways to look as if you have done your best to dress up that doesn’t necessarily mean the only significant thing would be to wear a grand tiara. Bracelets can be coiled into chignons and necklaces twisted, for example … I don’t think she is that interested in being big and splashy.”

She continues, “William and Catherine’s style is relatively low-key. It will be interesting to see what New Zealand and Australia give her. One of the reasons they do wear their good jewelry is because all the local women want to wear their good stuff and so the whole room is glittery, not just the royals.”

What’s your favorite of all the royal pieces? What would you like to see Kate wear? Tell us below!

–Simon Perry

The Latest Craze in Disco Styles Is See-Through Jeans—but Beware of Foggy Bottoms


Stay Connected


Advertise With Us

Learn More

Skip to content


The Latest Craze in Disco Styles Is See-Through Jeans—but Beware of Foggy Bottoms

Posted on

On a clear day, you can see forever—or at least that’s the wicked thought behind L.A. designer Agi Berliner’s transparent idea: see-through jeans. Exhibitionists notwithstanding, most folks wear them over bathing suits or as attention-getting evening wear with halters, garter belts and body stockings. Created for the disco crowd, the $34 jeans are selling like, well, hot pants. In just six weeks, 25,000 pairs have already been sold in such major department store chains as Macy’s, Bonwit’s and Saks.

“What’s limiting American designers is that we’re afraid to do something different,” says Berliner, 32, a Hungarian émigré who fled with her family to the U.S. in 1956. Agi thought up the gimmick in London while marveling at the way plastics were being employed by designers of punk fashion. In her L.A. office, where she designs for La Parisienne junior sportswear, Agi spent five days on the phone and six weeks testing to come up with the right plastic.

Agi herself tried out the French-cut jeans with the zipper in front, and quickly found several problems: Some plastics tore away from stitching, others wouldn’t bend and all fogged with perspiration. The ideal material proved to be a vinyl supplied by a bookbinder. The steam was eliminated with a series of vents behind the knees and in the crotch. “They’re no hotter than polyester pants,” claims Agi, “and if you wear them with tights, they won’t stick to your legs.”

Whatever the discomfort and despite the problem of Saturday night feverishness, discomaniacs report one major advantage of the plastic pants: no laundry bills. To keep Berliner’s see-through jeans clear, all the wearer needs is a little Windex.

Powered by WordPress.com VIP
Add A Comment

Got something to add to this post? Fill out the fields below to make a comment, ask a question or share a tip. We'd love to hear from you.

Note: If this is your first time commenting on Style News Now, your comment will need to be approved by our moderator before it will appear. Thanks for your patience, and check back again soon.

Showing 6 comments

Guest on

Even though I’m a fan of the Royals…its getting a little too much. Kate borrowed this piece…Diana borrowed that piece when she was alive. Please…People spare me and the other readers. This is not newsworthy information.


Who cares? We in GB detest Kate and her parasitic family. She was a horrid choice and will undoubtedly bring an end to the British royal family.

HM on

@ERII Speak for parasitic self. We in the UK love Kate. Her family is self-made millionaire. Nothing parasitic about that. They probably paid more taxes than you and your family ever had. The royal family have lived through the days of Charles and Diana cheating on each other and survived. Nothing has come close to that drama yet. So your rant is pointless.

Annie on

Kate is loathsome. As we say in our area about her, “Pearls before a swine.”

Annie on

HM, many of us agree with ER2. Kate is from nothing,. Do your homework. She is a stalker and a user. She is has yet to prove her worth in any way. And she is very cheap.

Joomla web hosting on

Presentation is the key to achieving business goals. Joomla is not only
for website building, but can be executed as a great networking tool, as well.

You can use the templates free of charge as long as you follow the terms of service provided by the developer of the template.